Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 05:08
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
The #1 Friday Habit You Should Start to Lose Visceral Fat, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Europe cuts interest rates as Trump's tariffs loom - BBC
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Knight, Nurse among unprotected in PWHL expansion - theScore.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Would you raise your children like your parents raised you?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
AI Cracks Mars Mystery: 500,000 Streaks Solved Without a Drop of Water - SciTechDaily
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
How do scammers communicate? Do they have a specific language or slang?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
Weed Could Be Wrecking Your Heart – Study Uncovers Dangers of Smoking and Edibles - SciTechDaily